✅ Quality Review Checklist
A systematic approach to reviewing AI-generated content before student delivery.
🎯 Factual Accuracy
AI can hallucinate facts. Verify all factual claims.
- All dates are correct and verified
- Names and proper nouns spelled correctly
- Formulas and equations are accurate
- Statistics come from reliable sources
- No hallucinated facts, events, or quotes
- Information is current (not outdated)
- Technical terms used correctly
⚠️ Common AI Hallucinations
- Invented historical dates or events
- Fabricated quotes from real people
- Made-up statistics or studies
- Non-existent book or paper references
📚 Pedagogical Appropriateness
Ensure content matches learning objectives and student readiness.
- Difficulty matches the proficiency level (1/3, 2/3, 3/3)
- Explanations are clear and logical
- Examples are relevant to students
- Scaffolding is properly structured
- Learning objectives are aligned
- Progression makes pedagogical sense
- Prerequisites are established before advanced concepts
⚖️ Cultural Sensitivity
AI can inherit biases from training data. Review for inclusivity.
- No biased representations of groups
- Inclusive examples across cultures
- Respectful of diverse perspectives
- No stereotypes or generalizations
- Appropriate for international students
- Gender-neutral language where appropriate
- Disability-inclusive language and examples
💡 Tip: Ask Yourself
"Would any student in my class feel excluded or stereotyped by this content?"
🔧 Technical Quality
Verify the content renders and functions correctly.
- No formatting errors
- Code snippets render correctly (if applicable)
- Mathematical equations display properly (LaTeX)
- Links work (if included)
- JSON structure is valid
- No corrupted or garbled text
- Images load correctly (if any)
📝 Assessment Quality (SATA)
For assessment content, additional checks are required.
- Questions are clearly written
- Correct answers are actually correct
- Distractors are plausible but clearly wrong
- No trick questions or ambiguous wording
- Questions match the competency being assessed
- Difficulty is appropriate for the level
- Explanations help learning (not just state correct answer)
- Select-all-that-apply questions have clear instructions
🔒 Student Safety
Ensure content is appropriate for all learners.
- Age-appropriate language
- No harmful or dangerous instructions
- No offensive content
- Sensitive topics handled appropriately
- No personally identifiable information
- External links are safe and appropriate
🤖 AI Critic Assistant
Use the built-in AI Critic to get automated feedback on your content before publishing.
How to Use AI Critic
1. Open Critic Modal
Click the 🔍 AI Critic button in the content editor toolbar.
2. Select Critic Type
Choose the type of review you need:
- 🎯 Factual Accuracy - Verifies facts, dates, formulas, and references
- 📚 Pedagogical Review - Checks learning objectives alignment and scaffolding
- ⚖️ Bias & Inclusivity - Identifies cultural, gender, or socioeconomic bias
- 📝 Assessment Quality - Reviews questions, answers, and distractors
- 🔧 Technical Quality - Validates JSON structure and rendering
- 🎓 Comprehensive Review - Full analysis across all dimensions
3. Review Feedback
The AI analyzes your content and provides structured feedback with severity levels:
- 🔴 Must Fix - Critical issues that must be addressed
- 🟡 Should Address - Important improvements recommended
- 🟢 Nice to Have - Minor suggestions for enhancement
4. Ask Questions (AI Chat)
Click 💬 Ask About This Criticism to chat with AI about any feedback you don't understand. The AI will explain technical terms in plain language.
💡 Pro Tip: Use AI Critic First
Run the AI Critic before manually reviewing content. It catches technical issues and common problems quickly,
letting you focus your time on pedagogical judgment and contextual appropriateness that only humans can assess.
AI Critic Types Explained
| Critic Type | What It Checks | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| 🎯 Factual | Facts, dates, formulas, statistics, references | STEM content, history, technical subjects |
| 📚 Pedagogical | Learning objectives, scaffolding, difficulty level, prerequisites | Any instructional content |
| ⚖️ Bias | Cultural stereotypes, gender bias, inclusivity | Social studies, diverse classrooms |
| 📝 Assessment | Question clarity, correct answers, distractor quality | SATA content specifically |
| 🔧 Technical | JSON validity, rendering, formatting | Content with code, equations, or complex structures |
| 🎓 Comprehensive | All of the above | Final review before publishing |
⚡ Quick Review Checklist
For a fast pass through content, check these essentials:
🎯 Must Check
- Factual accuracy of key claims
- Correct answers are correct (SATA)
- No obvious bias or stereotypes
- Difficulty matches level
👍 Should Check
- Clarity of explanations
- Relevance of examples
- Technical rendering
- Scaffolding structure
🔍 Deep Dive
- Cultural inclusivity
- Accessibility
- Curriculum alignment
- All links and references
⏱️ Time Investment
| Review Type | Time per Content | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Quick Scan | 2-3 minutes | Low-stakes content, trusted topic |
| Standard Review | 5-10 minutes | Normal classroom content |
| Deep Review | 15-20 minutes | High-stakes assessments, sensitive topics |
| Full Class Review | 2-3 hours | Initial content setup (24 pieces) |